Electric charge, like mass, is a fundamental property of matter in the universe. We understand charge because we can observe that charged objects or "particles" exert forces on one another.
Charge can exist in one of two states that we call positive and negative. Benjamin Franklin, an early researcher in electricity and charge, assigned the label positive to the charges that tend to move the most. We now know those to be negatively-charged electrons. Matter may be positively-charged, negatively-charged or neutral (not charged).
Charge is also a conserved quantity. In normal processes (things we would encounter in day-to-day life) charges are neither created from nothing nor destroyed.
The universe also tends to balance charges; in a given system (piece of the universe), there are generally the same number of positive and negative charges.
For example, in a salt crystal consisting of positively charged sodium ions (Na+) and negatively-charged chloride ions (Cl-), it is highly unlikely that we will have an unpaired charge. Those always tend to pair up.
Charges exert invisible forces on one another in a specific and predictable way. Like charges repel one another and opposite charges attract. This ought to make you pause for a second because it is already vastly different than the gravitational force, our other invisible force. Forces between charges can be attractive or repulsive. How many times have you been walking down the street and gotten ejected from Earth by gravity. Gravity has no repulsive component; it is a purely attractive force.
In the following sections we'll figure out the details of how charges interact and the units of charge. As the flow-chart above shows, we can divide our discussion about charge into static electricity phenomena and electric current. Static electricity refers the moving of charges from one object to another, where it is more-or-less static (doesn't move). Electric current is moving charge.
The SI unit of charge is the Coulomb (C), [pronounced kool'·ōm] named after French physicist Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, who developed Coulomb's law (below).
A Coulomb is the amount of charge on 6.242 × 1018 electrons.
The Coulomb is a fundamental unit, from which we derive a number of other useful units in the fields of electricity and magnetism, including the Ampere (A), which is the measure of electric current in C per second.
The charge of a single electron is 1.062 × 10-19 C. The symbol for charge is usually the letter q.
The unit of charge is the Coulomb, a fundamental SI unit. The charge of one electron is -1.062 × 10-19 C.
The charge of 1 mole (6.022 × 1023 e-) is about 96,500 C.
SI stands for Système international (of units). In 1960, the SI system of units was published as a guide to the preferred units to use for a variety of quantities. Here are some common SI units
The two fundamental charged particles in our universe are the proton (p+) and the electron (e-). They have charges of qp = +1.602 x 10-19 C and qe = -1.602 x 10-19 C, respectively.
Neutrons have no electric charge.
The force between two charges, q1 and q2 is given by Coulomb's law:
where k is the Coulomb constant, k = 9.0 x 109 N·m2·C-1. Fc stands for "Coulomb force," but sometimes it's written as Fes for "electrostatic force." We can view the constant of proportionality, k, as being there to get the units right [so that force has units of Newtons, (N)].
The force between two charges is proportional to the product of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance (r) between them.
Coulomb's law should remind you of the universal law of gravitation:
Both are called inverse-square laws because of their dependence on the reciprocal of the square of the distance between charges or masses. This is a very important aspect of these equations. If we double the distance between particles, the force between them (gravitational or electrostatic) decreases by a factor of four (22), not two.
Here is a picture of how the force falls off as a function of separation:
The electrostatic force (written as Fc or Fes) between two charges, q1 and q2 is given by Coulomb's law:
where k = 9.0 x 109 N·m2·C-1 is the Coulomb constant, the charges have units of Coulombs (C), and r is the separation between them in meters.
Solution: First we need some numbers. From the table above we get that the charge on the electron is qe = -1.603 × 10-19 C and the charge of the proton is qp = +1.603 × 10-19 C. The mass of the proton is mp = 1.67 × 10-27 Kg and the mass of the electron is me = 9.11 × 10-31 Kg.
The gravitational force is:
The electrostatic or Coulomb force is:
The electrostatic force is negative because a proton and a neutron attract each other, but we're really interested in the size (magnitude) of the force here. Now those forces are quite different. To see just how different, let's divide the larger force by the smaller:
That's an immense difference. The electrostatic force is 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger than the gravitational force.
Solution: This calculation is pretty straightforward, just plug the numbers into Coulomb's law.
First, notice that the radius of the spheres was a bit of a red herring here – not that useful as long as we're treating our spheres as point charges, a common approximation.
9.9 TeraNewtons is a tremendous force. Little could stop those spheres from smashing into one-another.
What this example really shows is that the Coulomb is a pretty large unit of charge. The charge on a mole of electrons (6 × 1023 electrons) is 96,485 C. That number is referred to as the Faraday constant.
The universe, as far as we know, seems to be balanced with respect to charge; there are as many positive charges as negative. A helium atom, for example, contains two protons and two electrons (and two neutrons with no charge), making it neutral overall.
But just because things are neutral doesn't mean we can't move charges around or cause imbalances. Many of the electronic devices we use depend strongly on our ability to accumulate and discharge charge. Here are some examples of how we can create those imbalances.
This is a pretty familiar trick. You rub your hair for a while with an inflated balloon, and a couple of things happen:
What's going on there?
When some materials are rubbed together, the electron clouds are close enough that electrons can be transferred from one kind of atom to another. Electrons usually transfer from substances (atoms) that hold them more weakly to those that hold them more strongly, thus we can usually predict which way they will flow by friction using measures like electron affinity.
Notice that in the diagram above, while the transfer of one electron from one neutral atom to another created a charge imbalance in both (more protons than electrons on the left, more electrons than protons on the right), the charge balance of the universe is unchanged.
The other critical thing to note is that it is electrons that move, not protons. All charge imbalances are created by the movement of electrons, not protons. It's because protons are about 2,000 times more massive than electrons, and they are held to the nucleus by a force stronger than the electrostatic force, the nuclear force.
Here's another example of static charging. If we rub a rubber rod with some fur or wool, the rubber rod will become negatively charged by picking up electrons from the fur. That rod can be used to touch two light-weight foil-covered balls hanging from threads, as shown.
When the rod touches the balls, electrons are transferred in order to reduce the charge imbalance in the rod. Both balls become equally negatively charged, and therefore repel one another, like this:
The same thing would happen if we removed electrons from the balls causing them both to be positively-charged.
When electrostatic charge changes between objects, it is electrons that move, not protons. Electrons are nearly 2,000 times less massive than protons, which are also tightly bound to the heavy nucleus.
Charges attract and repel each other through free space. That is, charges don't have to touch to exert a force on one another. We call that kind of charging induction.
Here's an example. In Figure below, we have a spherical object (say a metal ball) on a insulating stand. It is a neutral object with positive and negative charges evenly distributed around the surface of the sphere.In Fig. we bring a negatively-charged object close to the sphere, but out of contact. The negative charge on the object repels the negative charges in the sphere, causing the sphere to polarize. With the object held near, the sphere develops a positive side (pole) and a negative pole. It is said to be polarized.
Now (Fig. ) imagine that we attach a wire to the sphere on its negative side, where we have an abundance of electrons. We attach that wire to the ground, an infinitely-large "sink" of electrons, essentially something that has a very large capacity to absorb electrons without becoming significantly charged.
To reduce the charge imbalance, electrons will run through the wire into the ground until the repulsive force between all of those excess electrons on the right side of the sphere diminishes. Using an ammeter, we can detect a current, indicating that charges are moving through the wire.
Once the current diminishes, we can open a switch to break the path from the sphere to ground (Fig. ), electrically isolating the sphere, which is now positively charged – not because we added positive charge, but because we removed negatively-charged electrons.
Remember, it's the negative charges that move.
Some materials can "conduct" electric charge. The most familiar are probably metals, like the copper, silver or gold in the wires used in electronics. Conductors and electric current are covered more fully in another section.
We make a great deal of use out of electric current. We use the kinetic energy of flowing electrons to do work, produce heat and light, to charge and discharge elements in electric circuits, and to flip switches in digital circuits.
Not available yet ... stand by!
xaktly.com by Dr. Jeff Cruzan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. © 2012, Jeff Cruzan. All text and images on this website not specifically attributed to another source were created by me and I reserve all rights as to their use. Any opinions expressed on this website are entirely mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of my employers. Please feel free to send any questions or comments to firstname.lastname@example.org.